Sample HCCSSD101 Case Management and Understanding Community Services

HCCSSD101 Case Management and Understanding Community Services Sample

Assessment Task

Reflect on and discuss the importance of the four key principles underlying the code of ethics of case management (Case Management Society of Australia and New Zealand’s National Code of Ethics for Case Management (2013) or ACWA Code of Ethics and Practice (2017) to the development and delivery of community services. Under what circumstances may it be necessary to limit the application of the principle of autonomy and how might you compensate for this? Use examples toillustrate your analysis.

Please refer to the Instructions for details on how to complete this task.

Instructions

1. To complete this assessment task, address the following questions in your 1,500-word (+/- 10%) essay and provide examples as required:

• What are the four key principles underpinning professional community service practice?

• How are these articulated in codes of ethics?

• Why are they important to informing practice?

2. Choose an example where, in working in the role of a case manager, you are attempting to develop a case management plan with a person who has limited understanding of the process (i.e., this may be due to reduced cognitive and decision-making capacity, confusion brought about due to a mental illness or impairment, or due to language and cultural issues which may result in the person finding the experience of this engagement intimidating and alienating):

• Use your example to explore the challenges this situation contains.

• How may you continue to operate in ways which respect client autonomy.

What strategies or adjustments to your practice will you need to engage in to achieve this?

• One way of reflecting on their importance may be to reflect on and analyse the implications of their absence in the relationship between a client and a service.

The structure of your essay should include:

• A separate cover page with the subject name and code, your name, the assessment number and title, and your Learning Facilitator’s name.

• Introduction (approximately 250 words) which contains a clear statement of the purpose of the essay and what you will cover, together with any relevant background information.

• The Main Body (approximately 1,000 words) which should contain identification of issues and their disassembly into parts and critical perspective to be applied in analysing the constituent parts.

• Conclusion (approximately 250 words) which summarises the key points of your essay.

Solution

Introduction

Ethical principles play a fundamental role in professional practice, serving as a foundational basis that establishes a moral framework to direct professionals in their engagements with clients and communities. Ethical decision-making and conduct within the realm of community service practice are significantly influenced by four fundamental principles: beneficence, nonmaleficence, justice, and autonomy. The aim of this essay is to thoroughly examine these principles and their importance in guiding professional community service practice. For Assignment Help, This essay covers a comprehensive description and analysis of the four fundamental principles that underlie professional community service practice, namely beneficence, nonmaleficence, justice, and autonomy. Every principle is thoroughly examined, providing a comprehensive explanation of its meaning, importance, and applicability to practical situations. The essay elucidated the manner in which these principles are expressed in codes of ethics, furnishing professionals with a lucid framework of directives and benchmarks for ethical behaviour.

Moreover, the essay covers concrete illustrations and situations in which professionals face difficulties in implementing these principles, such as when dealing with individuals who possess restricted comprehension or decision-making capabilities. This study examines the strategies and adjustments made in practice to ensure the preservation of client autonomy and rights during the case management process.

Main Body

There are four key principles underpinning professional community service practice such as beneficence, nonmaleficence, justice, and autonomy. Professionalism in many disciplines, including community service, is grounded in the ethical principles of beneficence, nonmaleficence, justice, and autonomy (Moore, 2016).

The idea of beneficence stresses the significance of enhancing people's and societies' well-being and welfare. It mandates that service providers put their customers' needs first and work to enhance their quality of life and the likelihood of a successful result. Practising professionally in a way that tries to have good outcomes and promote a feeling of caring and support is an example of beneficence (Tost et al. 2015). In community service, Volunteers in the community work to help those in need, whether they are members of disadvantaged groups or those with special circumstances. The concept of beneficence directs professionals to promote the welfare of their communities by facilitating access to healthcare, education, social services, and community development projects (Moore, 2016).

The concept of nonmaleficence, sometimes known as "do no harm," stresses the need to protect service receivers from any potential pain or distress (Della Croce, 2023). It necessitates that those in the field be alert to possible dangers and take the required safety measures to avoid injury. In community service, Professionals doing community service have a responsibility to avoid making matters worse by introducing unanticipated complications. To do so successfully requires careful evaluation, awareness of cultural norms, and cooperation with customers and communities (In K. Crinall & L. Berends, n.d.)

Fairness, equality, and reasonable distribution of goods and services are all central to justice. It stresses respecting all people and groups without bias or prejudice (Rahimzadeh et al. 2022). Community service professionals are responsible for fighting for social justice by identifying and addressing systematic injustices (Martin et al. 2018).

Autonomy allows people to make their judgements and choices without interference from others (Susser et al. 2019). This guiding concept acknowledges the importance of autonomy and individual choice. In community service, autonomy entails giving people and groups a say in the decisions that impact them (Martin et al. 2018).

These four principles are important because they provide a firm ethical foundation and guarantee that professionals operate honestly and decently. By sticking to these guidelines, professionals earn the confidence of their clients and the respect of their communities. Individuals are more inclined to actively participate and work with specialists they trust, improving the quality of services given (Qalati et al. 2021). The significance of these concepts in informing practice is strengthened when they are included in codes of ethics. Codes of ethics lay forth explicit principles and standards for conduct to ensure uniformity and responsibility among professionals in a certain industry. Ethics codes serve to remind professionals of their ethical obligations and to assist them in prioritising ethical issues in their day-to-day work by defining the principles of beneficence, nonmaleficence, justice, and autonomy (Beauchamp & Childress, 2009).

In community service sectors, including social work, counselling, and healthcare, the values of beneficence, nonmaleficence, justice, and autonomy are stated in codes of ethics (Acwa.org.au, 2023). The idea of beneficence, espoused in professional codes of ethics, requires service providers to put their customers' interests ahead of their own (Tost et al. 2015). Guidelines for delivering high-quality treatment, improving outcomes, and showing compassion and empathy might all be part of such a document. Professional ethics codes also encourage practitioners to actively look for ways to improve the lives of their clients and the communities in which they work (Beauchamp & Childress, 2009).

The idea of nonmaleficence is enshrined in ethical codes when it is clear that professionals are responsible for putting their patients' or customers' health and safety first (Della Croce, 2023). It might contain recommendations for minimising risk, evaluating possible hazards, and taking appropriate safety measures. The notion of justice, as outlined in ethical codes, calls for professionals to ensure that all people and communities have the same opportunities to benefit from their work (Rahimzadeh et al. 2022). Making sure the most vulnerable people in society get the help they need requires fighting for structural changes, removing obstacles, and raising awareness about existing ones. The dedication to getting informed permission from those receiving services, maintaining confidentiality, and recognising cultural and individual diversity in decision-making are all examples of how autonomy is expressed in codes of ethics (Beauchamp & Childress, 2009).

The following list is the most important principle to consider when deciding whether to buy a home. Professionals are obligated to put the needs of their customers and communities first and work tirelessly to improve their situation. The principle of nonmaleficence emphasises doing no damage to those receiving care and taking all reasonable measures to keep them safe (Della Croce, 2023). Justice promotes justice and equity by resolving inequities within the system. When people are given the freedom to make their own choices, it is called autonomy (Susser et al. 2019). These guidelines give a moral compass, patient-centred treatment, risk reduction strategies, and an emphasis on good results. They ensure moral behaviour and beneficial effects on persons who receive community service by guiding decision-making, increasing responsibility, and encouraging continual development in practice (Moore, 2016).

For example, an individual I'm dealing with as a case manager has a poor comprehension of the case management process owing to cognitive impairment. This person has difficulty understanding and making choices about their care, which makes the engagement process daunting and perplexing.

The key problem here is respecting the individual's right to autonomy and self-determination as part of the case management process (Susser et al. 2019). It's critical to get their input before making any choices on their behalf. In addition, it is hard to grasp the individual's preferences and wants due to language and cultural limitations, which further alienate the person and impede effective communication.

Several tactics and adaptations to my practice will use to ensure that the client's autonomy is respected at all times. I will start by making an effort to put myself in the other person's shoes by learning as much as I can about their history, values, and preferred methods of expression. To overcome language hurdles and facilitate clear communication, I will work in tandem with interpreters or cultural liaisons. Involving the person's loved ones or support system is another way I plan to learn more about the individual's priorities and priorities.

I will use clear language and visual aids to clarify difficult material and boost understanding in order to produce a case management plan that respects the client's autonomy. If it takes numerous sessions, I will make sure that the individual has enough opportunity to voice their opinions and preferences in order to facilitate meaningful involvement in the decision-making process. During these discussions, it is crucial to be patient, empathic, and attentive so that the other person feels heard and respected.

If the values of autonomy and beneficence aren't followed in this relationship, the other person may feel disempowered and cut out of the decision-making process (Susser et al. 2019). A less efficient case management strategy results if their requirements and preferences are not properly considered. In their absence, trust and communication between the client and the service break down, which in turn increases the risk of the customer not following the plan or dropping out of the service completely.

Conclusion

The essay identified that the four guiding principles of professional practice—beneficence, nonmaleficence, justice, and autonomy—are crucial ethical notions that educate and drive community service professionals in their relationships with clients and communities. To ensure that professional practice is founded on integrity, compassion, and respect for human rights, these principles serve as a moral compass and provide a framework for ethical decision-making and behaviour.

It mentioned that the idea of beneficence encourages professionals to actively pursue good results and enhance the quality of life for the people they serve, putting the needs of their clients first. Together, nonmaleficence and beneficence encourage practitioners to avoid damage and take steps to avoid unintended outcomes. Justice places an emphasis on justice and equality, putting pressure on professionals to combat inequalities in society and fight for the rights of marginalised groups. By definition, practitioners must respect their clients' right to self-determination by giving them a voice in, and ultimately benefiting from their decisions.
The value of these concepts is reaffirmed in practice by the codes of ethics that codify them in the form of explicit norms and standards. A solid ethical basis is provided by codes of ethics, which guarantee uniformity, accountability, and adherence to professional norms in all areas of community service practice.

References