Sample EC301 Agriculture and Resource Policy Report 2

EC301 Agriculture and Resource Policy Report 2 Sample

This consists of a detailed policy evaluation of an article on any current agricultural or policy issue.

For the policy you have chosen, prepare a brief report considering the following:

1. Take the article as your starting point (this could be an academic journal article or from a magazine). Use the article to stimulate your discussion.

2. Clearly identify the policy you are exploring (i.e. it can be a historical broad policy like green revolution or a specific current one like food policy, climate policy etc.). Give some sense of the scope of the policy here.

3. Remember always with policy - focus on the ‘tensions’ that this policy is trying to address (social, historical, economic etc.).

4. Bring in a range of perspectives (stakeholder) – what are the other options available for this
policy?

5. Critique the article you have chosen on strengths and weaknesses and equity (the demographics of the people who bear the cost of this policy, has this policy alleviate inequality) ?

6. Bring you discussion to a conclusion.

7. Remember, with policy, the “devil is often in the detail”. Part of policy analysis is to explore how the policy plays out in practice with individual farmers/communities etc.

8. Consider unintended consequences – e.g. how the CAP impacts on other non-EU countries.

Style Guide

You are required to use the APA Referencing style.

Format

The format for the report is set out here. The written component needs to include:

• The title of the case study (not include in word count)

• Student names and numbers (not include in word count)

• Code and title of the Unit (not include in word count)

• Statement of authorship using the following words: I declare that this assignment was researched and written by us. We did not use any learning resources that have not been acknowledged. We have not copied from any other work. (not include in word count).

Solution

Introduction

In this policy evaluation aspect selected article is based on preventing non-communicable disease by healthier agriculture production. As the cause of spreading NCDs tobacco and alcohol are considered which also comes under agricultural production which even support country economy growth. So, in this review a logical flow is developed by which policy brief to its flaws all can be presented in simpler form. Furthermore, stakeholders' perspective and critique of the sleeted article is done to represent the real position of the developed policy. It creates the chances for determining the policy benefits and limitations for the individual farmer to the country 's economy.

1. Exploring Policy

In the selected article of Lencucha et al. (2020) NCD policy is explored to understand the aim of controlling agricultural production and healthier options adoption. The justified cause for the selected non-communication disease prevention policy is to promote control over unhealthy food and tobacco production in the agriculture industry. As the industrial responsibility for caring for consumer health comes with profitable earnings in production return, a need to bridge public and agriculture is reviewed. This selected article through an industrial stand and public sphere both explored understanding policy accuracy while practices.

Figure 1: Policy Influencing Factors
(Source: Lencucha et al. 2020)

In the above figure, discussed Government policy for The Assignment Helpline and its influencing aspect are presented to create the balance it holds for the future. Additionally, the understanding a bit about production and profit policies like the Malian Fertilizer Subsidy program is explored in this review paper (Lencucha et al. 2020). It comes with a review of negative and positive spheres both of which indicate policy implementation only cannot cover up the outcome superiority. In this paper, a logical flow of the paper outcome through policy boundary and adoption gap is explained to understand the policy practical context. In a detailed analysis of this selected paper through policy influences a contradictory argument is possible to develop that makes impact for the policy's actual impact. In the stand of agriculture production, different aspects like input sources, technical supports, and output supports all are reviewed in this review article. It helps to draw upon the view of the policies influencing terms and actual outcomes for industrial production. In the view of Fleming et al. (2021), agriculture industry change is driven by resource security and the ability or interest to maintain traditional norms of farming shown in Figure 2. In linking with that aspect, a link of production interest and prevention of non-communicable disease growth is noticed.

Figure 2: Resources and Innovation Relation within Agriculture
(Source: Fleming et al. 2021)

2. Addressing Aspects of the Policy

The tension this policy addresses in social and economic aspects as agricultural production is causing an impact on consumer well-being. In this aspect, the Government's responsibility for controlled agriculture production and prevention of non-communicable diseases is reviewed in this paper (Lencucha et al. 2020). In this review Government involvement in supporting farmer livelihood and security of food is mentioned. A concern and ethical responsibility of industrial performance rise automatically while planning for production after effects. As the spreading of NCDs continuously poses a burden on the Government for health service costs, immediate initiatives for fostering a healthy lifestyle are prioritized. This review paper informs about the correlation and production control to ensure the safety of the social sphere without suppressing the industrial economy. In this goal of fostering better health direct control of the production of harmful products such as tobacco is noticed.

On the other hand, Lencucha and Thow (2020), argued that as unhealthy food and alcohol production comes as highly influencing industry for the country's economy a nature of negligence for social goods is noticed. In this view a gap between Government goal transparency and the production plan to ensure social safety is contradictory. A clear challenge is noticed for the Government to take control over the industry which itself negatively impacts the social sphere yet is profitable in economic aspects. In this review paper through actual changes and policy strength, all are analyzed to understand still now vulnerable areas for policy strengthening.

Figure 3: Prevalence of Australian Health Condition
(Source: Statista, 2024)

In the above figure health conditions in Australia are presented for 2024 updated data which claimed 11% of CVD complications (Statista, 2024). Furthermore, aligning with the review paper then the social sphere is faced with tension for the policy address in this situation. Only agricultural production cannot promote sustainability for the people of the country. It needs more focus for healthier production. In a critical review of the selected paper, a clear understanding is developed of the policy gap that existed within the Australian context. Furthermore, this tension between the social sphere and the scope for economic opportunity needs to be reshaped so that the future of safety for all can be validated in the Australian context.

3. Stakeholders Perspective

In the selected paper stakeholders are mainly focused on farmers, the Government, and the people of the country. Additionally, the policy context and its influences show the impact on different spheres though main attention is given to social & economic aspects. Firstly, the Government and farmers linked to the country's economy are established as the growth of agriculture production directly influences the economic aspect of the country. In the view of Townsend and Schram (2020) a continuous trade war is noticed for Australia and New Zealand against the United States & China. Furthermore, in pressure of rile-based trading and recent efforts to negotiate with the Comprehensive Economic Partnership create the demand for sustainable production. In the selected article it has been found that sending seeds, fertilizers, and equipment directly proportion with a positive rise in agriculture production. The previously mentioned policy of the Malian Fertilizer Subsidy Program works to support farmers even it connected with government initiatives to support framer livelihood. On the other hand, technical support is also explored for government interest in pushing up the production that supports trade tension gain.

In support of this aspect, Llewellyn and Ouzman (2020) stated that learning-intensive processes and multifaceted methods are adopted by the Austrian agriculture industry. This indicated that the positive adoption of technical support helps farmers to work with innovation. It has been found that supporting farmers with needs like subsidized prices as agriculture input helps to raise the positive outcome of production. Furthermore, as much as the support they received for the production as stakeholders of the agriculture industry a scope for drawing excellent outcomes is possible. In this detail of the policy and stakeholders involved with agriculture make sense of the reviewing outcome in future scope for Australian Agriculture. According to Goulding et al. (2020), the demand for access to less expensive and affordable diets rather than typical diets makes the demand for sustainable affordability. In alignment with a review of the consumer perspective, responsibility for affordable and fair access to agriculture production is noticed that needs to be managed.

4. Critique of the Article

The selected article is based on four policy dimensions that are evident enough to justify the benefits and existing limitations. Additionally, the first policy is about input support that uses the Malian Fertility Subsidy Program which showed that people with program participation can achieve higher yields than others. The cost benefits this policy provides for support in production showed a negative outcome for poor influences though that varied with participants. The identified support the Australian Agriculture industry produced includes 2.7% value addition and employment for 2.2% (Australian Government, 2024). This makes sense because the benefits for growth are promoted through input support as people's involvement and participation make the outcome strong.

On the other hand, output support showed that crop diversification and production growth are linked with each other. Linking with a contradiction of import tariff and production decline is noticed for this aspect. Erenstein et al. (2022) argued that changes are noticed for crop improvement so that diversity can support production optimization. In these two dimensions, cost benefits may be limited as the production importing and strength of resource security may vary which impacts participation. It has been found that without working with innovation and focusing on the large goal may gap in the actual need for policy adoption in the Australian agriculture industry.

The selected review paper showed that technical support can positively change agriculture production. Furthermore, technical supports are required in different areas like service extension, structural development investment, and total farming cooperation. This promotes the need for priority because the technical aspect of Australian Agriculture promotes the growth of income. The importance of financial policy intervention is vital as it influences tax debit, cash subsidy, insurance, and others. It has been found that support in crop production is associated with the financial policy of agriculture. However, it contradicts the Common Agriculture Policy as it shows the fall of farming efficiency for increased payment. Along with positive income sources, Demestichas et al. (2020) argued that modern farming always comes with technical threats. However, security threats of modern farming may increase the risk of costs for the investment and farmers' livelihood. On the other hand, in the goal of supporting the agriculture economy, the Global Agriculture and Food Security Program is launched which contradicts the paper findings for misuse of payment. By this GAFSP a social value is promoted for the people who need support in income security and are involved with a higher yielding goal of agriculture (Australian Government, 2024).

5. Conclusion

It has been found that farmers receive the support to secure their livelihood within the Austrian Agriculture Industry. Additionally, supporting policy and exploring consequences for the yielding growth is indicated about the scope for future. As input policy showed that individual farmers with proper support of resources and knowledge were able to provide better production. The technical and financial support also makes an impact over the farmer's income. Though, this policy review shows the area of flaws even in farmer performance. Like the nature of misuse, payment increase and decline in performance efficiency all make the concern for right ways of policy control. Considering the flaws and strength of the reviewed policies of Australian Agriculture. On the other hand, CAP impact for unintended consequences is observed for supporting the country 's economy and meeting its needs.  

References