Sample DFVP20001 Domestic and Family Violence Theories and Perspectives

DFVP20001 Domestic and Family Violence Theories and Perspectives Assignment Sample

Literature and references

In this assessment use at least 6 contemporary references (<10 years) to support your discussion. You may also use seminal scholarly literature where relevant. Suitable references include peer-reviewed journal articles as well as textbooks and credible websites. When sourcing information, consider the 5 elements of a quality reference: currency, authority, relevance, objectivity, and coverage. Grey literature sourced from the internet must be from reputable websites such as from government, university, or peak national bodies: for example, AIHW, AIFS, ABS, ANROWS, and AIC.

Requirements

• Use a conventional and legible size 12 font, such as Times New Roman or Arial, with 1.5 line spacing and 2.54cm page margins (standard pre-set margin in Microsoft Word).

• Include page numbers on each page in a header.
• Write in the third-person perspective.
• Use formal academic language.
• Use the seventh edition American Psychological Association (APA) referencing style.

The CQUniversity Academic Learning Centre has an online APA Referencing Style Guide.

• The word count excludes the reference list but includes in-text references and direct quotations.

Resources

• You can use unit provided materials and other credible sources (e.g. journal articles, books, grey literature) to reference your argument. The quality and credibility of your sources are important.

• We recommend that you access your discipline specific library guide: the Social Work and Community Services Guide.

• We recommend you use EndNote to manage your citations and reference list. More information on how to use EndNote is available at the CQUniversity Library website.

• For information on academic communication please go to the Academic Learning Centre Moodle site. The Academic Communication section has many helpful resources including information for students with English as a second language.

• Submit a draft before the due date to review your Turnitin Similarity Score before making a final submission. Instructions are available here.

Submission

Submit your assessment via the unit Moodle site in Microsoft Word format only.

Marking Criteria

Refer to the marking rubric below for more detail on how marks will be assigned.

Assessment 1 (Portfolio) Due 17th Dec - More info here

Type: Written assessment

Due date: 5.00pm (AEST) Friday, 17 December 2021 (Week 5)

Weighting: 30%

Length: 1500 words plus or minus 10% (excluding references)

Unit Coordinator: Dr Nicola Cheyne

Learning Outcomes Assessed

2. Identify and describe relevant research and other sources of data related to domestic and family violence integrating terminology appropriate to the field.

3. Analyse the basis for contemporary theories of domestic and family violence, with a focus on gender.

Aim

The aim of this assignment help is to guide your exploration of the relationship between gender and domestic and family violence (DFV), specifically intimate partner violence (IPV).

Instructions

Present your answers to the following tasks in paragraph/short answer format (no introduction or conclusion). Altogether your answers to these tasks will entail a detailed analysis of current knowledge regarding IPV victimisation/perpetration experiences of men compared to women.

Please follow the steps below to complete your assessment task:

1. Present current Australian national data (e.g., Australian Bureau of Statistics) on IPV perpetration and IPV victimisation. Are there gendered patterns of perpetration and victimisation? (i.e. who are the perpetrators and who are the victims?) (approx. 400 words).

2. What are the key points of agreement and disagreement in academic literature, regarding the gendered nature of IPV? Ensure you identify the arguments for viewing IPV as gendered, and identify the arguments against viewing IPV as gendered (approx. 800 words).

3. Has your examination of data and literature, challenged your previous understanding or beliefs about the nature of IPV? Explain your response (approx. 300 words).

Literature and references

In this assessment use at least 6 contemporary references (<10 years) to support your discussion. You may also use seminal scholarly literature where relevant. Suitable references include peer-reviewed journal articles as well as textbooks and credible websites. When sourcing information, consider the 5 elements of a quality reference: currency, authority, relevance, objectivity, and coverage. Grey literature sourced from the internet must be from reputable websites such as from government, university, or peak national bodies: for example, AIHW, AIFS, ABS, ANROWS, and AIC.

Requirements

· Use a conventional and legible size 12 font, such as Times New Roman or Arial, with 1.5 line spacing and 2.54cm page margins (standard pre-set margin in Microsoft Word).

· Include page numbers on each page in a header.

· Write in the third-person perspective.

· Use formal academic language.

· Use the seventh edition American Psychological Association (APA) referencing style. The CQUniversity Academic Learning Centre has an online APA Referencing Style Guide.

Dashboard / My units / 2021 Term 3 / DFVP20001_2213 / Assessment / Assessment 1 (Portfolio) Due 17th Dec - More info here
12/1/21, 12:34 PM DFVP20001_2213: Assessment 1 (Portfolio) Due 17th Dec - More info here
https://moodle.cqu.edu.au/mod/assign/view.php?id=2306395 2/3
DFVP20001 Assignment 1 (2).pptx 27 October 2021, 4:55 PM
DFVP20001_T3_2021_Assessment1.pdf 27 October 2021, 4:55 PM
Video on Portfolio 1.mp4 27 October 2021, 4:55 PM

· The word count excludes the reference list but includes in-text references and direct quotations.

Resources

· You can use unit provided materials and other credible sources (e.g. journal articles, books, grey literature) to reference your argument. The quality and credibility of your sources are important.

· We recommend that you access your discipline specific library guide: the Social Work and Community Services Guide.

· We recommend you use EndNote to manage your citations and reference list. More information on how to use EndNote is available at the CQUniversity Library website.

· For information on academic communication please go to the Academic Learning Centre Moodle site. The Academic Communication section has many helpful resources including information for students with English as a second language.

· Submit a draft before the due date to review your Turnitin Similarity Score before making a final submission. Instructions are available here.

Submission

Submit your assessment via the unit Moodle site in Microsoft Word format only.

Marking Criteria

Refer to the marking rubric below for more detail on how marks will be assigned.

Solution

1. Present current Australian national data (e.g., Australian Bureau of Statistics) on IPV perpetration and IPV victimization. Are there gendered patterns of perpetration and victimization? (i.e., who are the perpetrators and who are the victims?)

In case of IPV, perpetrators are accounted to be an individual who uses violence and abuse on the other partner while the person witnessing and experiencing the violence is termed as victim (Valtchanov & Parry, 2017). According to the Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS), Personal Safety Survey of 2016, the female population who witness partner or intimate violence have direct or indirect relation with a disability, financial stress, long term health issues, low life satisfaction, as well as unemployment. These factors are altogether explained to be the nature of vulnerability by the Victoria Practice Guidelines. It was also assessed that the prevalence rate of the female population witnessing physical or sexual assault from their current or previous intimate partners in a duration of 12 months is around 132,000 of the female population. The statistics highlight the incidence rate to be common enough as it is experienced by one in every four female populations within diverse communities of Australia (Australian Bureau of Statistics, 2021). This female population have been shown to witness at least one such partners by whom they have experienced intimate partner violence from the age of 15 years. The report also highlighted that out of these female populations, 16 % of the individuals have experienced intimate partner violence in the past two years. Also, several studies have supported the fact that the female population living in capital cities have experienced a similar rate of intimate partner violence to those of the female population living in remote regions of Australia in the past two years.

Thus, the statistics and the report demonstrated by the Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS)stated that the female population are mostly identified as the victims while their partners account for the male population as the perpetrators. According to Structural Feminist Perspective, domestic violence is a gender issue where the abuser uses violence to dominate the female population to reflect power. It states “examine the effects of societal structures and power relations between dominant and oppressed groups on female population” (Valtchanov & Parry, 2017, p. 557). It has also been found that the female population who is a single parent to their children are the most susceptible population who are highly associated with experiencing intimate violence within their lives in the current years (Australian Bureau of Statistics, 2021). The statistics of these single-parent household female population to witness intimate violence is three times higher than the other categories under which female population witnesses intimate violence as the prevalence rate is 8.1 among single mothers. Also, the female population belonging to the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander are more susceptible to IPV as compared to those of the non-indigenous populations. According to the subculture of violence theory, explains the willingness and intention of an individual to involve in violence and people within a community are influenced and promoted by the support ensured within a community. Thus, it can be stated the female population are the victims of intimate violence where the male population have been accounted to be the perpetrators.

2. What are the key points of agreement and disagreement in academic literature, regarding the gendered nature of IPV? Ensure you identify the arguments for viewing IPV as gendered, and identify the arguments against viewing IPV as gendered

There is a wide range of studies and research that have been carried out focusing on the gender difference in the case of intimate partner violence or IPV which demonstrated a range of unpredictable evidence and the agreement and the disagreement between the two. Many of the studies support evident learning that the prevalence of men witnessing IPV is similar to those of the statistics of the female population in similar conditions. While there are many other studies that state that men are the perpetrators of the intimate partner violence witnessed by the female population. The national data thus lacks major evidence on the prevalence of men witnessing IPV which often makes it difficult to evaluate the gendered nature of the condition within the premises of Australia. Men are found to be victims of violence but the statistics of witnessing intimate violence is quite low as men are assessed to face violence from strangers or others due to professionals and personal reasons. Intimate violence is found to be more likely to happen with a female population which is a figure of more than 17 per cent when compared to men where the statistics are less than half of the overall numbers of the female population experiencing violence (World Health Organization, 2021).

According to Dawson et al. (2019), the evidences agreed on the idea of IPV as gendered, as intimate partner violence is one of the public health concerns in worldwide nations with a 4 % prevalence rate in a duration of a year. The condition is widely conducted by men where the victims are mostly identified as the female population which explains the burned on the health care and social services along with the economy of every country. It is known to have a major impact on the physical and mental health of these victims as they withstand sexual, mental, and physical abuse from their past or present partners. The prevalence is identified to be higher in the female population belonging to the younger age group (Dawson et al., 2019). Thus, emergency departments are guided to refer these susceptible female populations to social service providers as soon as they recover from the injuries.

According to Cho et al. (2020), the research evidence agreed on the fact that IPV is gendered and the report provided by National Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence Survey showed that gender has a fair set of interaction with the nature of IPV. The research was carried out using 3878 survivors of intimate partner violence where 3009 were female while 869 were men. It reflected the fact that though the prevalence is much higher in the case of the female population, men are also found to witness some rate of violence in their intimate relationships carried out by the female population.
The independent variable that was identified in the research included race, income, gender as well as financial stability along with the pattern and outcome of victimization (Cho et al., 2020). It has been also identified in the study that the female population have experienced a negative impact of intimate violence on their health thrice than men. Also, physical injuries and harm have been identified to occur in the female population more likely than men which makes them susceptible to negative consequences of IPV.

One of the researchers disagreed on IPV being gendered and identified the incidences of the traditional view which is currently being followed, as the male was always accounted to be the perpetrator while the female population were identified to be victims. Thus, there is a limited range of research studies that have been carried out to assess the intimate partner violence rate within men as researchers mainly focus on assessing the victimisation of the female population towards IPV. Also, LGBT communities have been witnessed to sustain a major rate of intimate violence which is also neglected by most of the research studies and statistics surveys (Laskey, Bates& Taylor, 2019). It has been found in a study survey that men have reported to witnessed different types of consequences of intimate partner violence which includes sexual, physical, manipulative, and verbal abuse in their relationship. Also, the report states that men after reporting the experience of IPV have to sustain the increased rate of harassment and abuse by society, family, police and other service providers. It is because people find it difficult to accept that a man in relation would have experienced intimate violence due to traditional mindset and beliefs. Also, in such situations, men have been doubted as the perpetrators and were imprisoned for the same (Gerke et al., 2020).

In research carried out by Bates (2020), experiences of men with IPV are identified to impact the mental and physical health similar to those of the female population and often impact their future relationships with children or any other intimate partner. Men have been describing that the beliefs, attitude and response of the society and the service providers to the incidence of reporting of IPV on men has also developed a major threatening and harassing situation for these susceptible populations (Bates, 2020). It has been supporting the evidence that men are accounted to be abusers and often the issue they witness gets neglected due to the wide range of supportive measures precisely focusing on the female population accounted as the only victims of IPV. Thus, it has been found that the “Violence against Women and Girls” strategy has categorized intimate partner violence as a gendered crime due to the lack of consideration towards the male population.

3. Has your examination of data and literature, challenged your previous understanding or beliefs about the nature of IPV? Explain your response

Yes, with the understanding and evidence provided by the other research articles, a well-developed belief or mindset was developed where men were identified as the perpetrators of this kind of violence and abuse against the female population. The statical reports provided by the World Health Organization as well as theAustralian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) Personal Safety Survey provided an understanding of the rising issue of intimate partner violence in the female population (World Health Organization, 2021). The belief was biased in nature as evidence have mainly highlighted the abuse and violence witnessed by the female population, but as other researches were assessed and evaluated, a dissimilar understanding was examined. The research analyses of other research articles apart from the Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) Personal Safety Survey helped in acknowledging the fact that though the female population are mostly the victims of IPV, men have been provided less consideration and support as they have also sustained similar issue but in a lesser rate. The condition has a similar explanation to the System Tension and Feedback System Theory of domestic and family violence as it states that stress and conflict within intrafamilial factors often lead to maintaining violence within the family and even society (Sunitha, 2021). Focusing on the theory it can be stated that not only the female population, but men have also been witnessing severity of physical, sexual and mental abuse in their intrafamilial intimate relationship. These factors often get neglected due to deprived support and service provided to them due to a biased mindset. The feminist theories focus on the collection of feminist approaches which focuses on addressing the issue of violence faced by the female population and account men as the abuser for which they guide the female population to fight against the issue of abuse (Subirana-Malaret, Gahagan & Parker, 2019).It was found that men are frequently accounted to be the abuser or perpetrator in such conditions even when they are the victims and are penalized and imprisoned for a crime for which they were never convicted. Thus, it helped me understand the fact that both male and female populations are victims of intimate partner violence, though the statistics vary widely. It is necessary to ensure equal rights and support to both the male and female population within the society. It is essential for the community to ensure equal support, right and care to the men when they are identified to be the victims for which government need to provide equal position to men in terms of IPV victims.

References

Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Partner Violence - In Focus: Crime and Justice Statistics, Partner Violence - January 2020. Australian Bureau of Statistics. Retrieved 2 December 2021, from https://www.abs.gov.au/statistics/people/crime-and-justice/focus-crime-and-justice-statistics/partner-violence-january-2020#characteristics-of-partner-violence

Bates, E. A. (2020). “No one would ever believe me”: An exploration of the impact of intimate partner violence victimization on men. Psychology of Men & Masculinities, 21(4), 497.Retrieved from: https://core.ac.uk/reader/169434710

Cho, H., Seon, J., Han, J. B., Shamrova, D., & Kwon, I. (2020). Gender differences in the relationship between the nature of intimate partner violence and the survivor’s help-seeking. Violence against women, 26(6-7), 712-729. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801219841440

Dawson, A. J., Rossiter, C., Doab, A., Romero, B., Fitzpatrick, L., & Fry, M. (2019). The emergency department response to women experiencing intimate partner violence: insights from interviews with clinicians in Australia. Academic emergency medicine, 26(9), 1052-1062.https://doi.org/10.1111/acem.13721

Gerke, J., Rassenhofer, M., Witt, A., Sachser, C., &Fegert, J. M. (2020). Female-perpetrated child sexual abuse: prevalence rates in Germany. Journal of child sexual abuse, 29(3), 263-277. https://doi.org/10.1080/10538712.2019.1685616

Laskey, P., Bates, E. A., & Taylor, J. C. (2019). A systematic literature review of intimate partner violence victimisation: An inclusive review across gender and sexuality. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 47, 1 11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2019.02.014

Subirana-Malaret, M., Gahagan, J., & Parker, R. (2019). Intersectionality and sex and gender-based analyses as promising approaches in addressing intimate partner violence treatment programs among LGBT couples: A scoping review. Cogent Social Sciences, 5(1), 1644982.https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2019.1644982

Sunitha, P. (2021). Domestic Violence And Theories, Retrieved 4 December 2021, from https://euroasiapub.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/18ESSDec-4386-1.pdf#:~:text=System%20Tension%20and%20Feedback%20System%20Theoahsry%3A%20This%20theory,

which%20maintain%20violence%20in%20family%20and%20in%20society.

Valtchanov, B. L., & Parry, D. C. (2017). Reclaiming the “F-word”: Structural Feminist Theories of Leisure. In The Palgrave Handbook of Leisure Theory, (pp. 557-576). Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-56479-5_32

World Health Organization. (2021). Apps.who.int. Retrieved 2 December 2021, from https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/77432/WHO_RHR_12.36_eng.pdf.